Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

  Recent Software News
Mozilla Releases Firefox 1.0 RC2
Intel Desktop Control Center 1.3.0....
Google Desktop Search Plus
Azureus 2.2.0.0
iTunes 4.7
  Recent Gaming News
Ken Kutaragi's Comments on PSP Refr...
Hitman Strikes Again - Blood Money
World of Warcraft - November 23
Half-Life 2 given MA15+ Rating
Half-Life 2 headed to arcades
  Recent Reviews
 · CoolerMaster Aerogate 3 A...
 · CoolerMaster AquaGate Wat...
 · OCZ Copper BGA Ramsinks
 · Mapower Warps Portable 3....
 · Vantec - PCI & RAM Slot P...
  Recent Forum Posts
Leadtek A350XT TDH and overclo...
FX5900U vs 9800Pro
Google Gmail Invites
Doom 3 SDK Released
Windows XP Sp2 Problems
  Announcement

Welcome to AusPCWorld - Australia's Leading PC Technology News & Reviews site.



> AusPCWorld > Tech News > Microsoft FAT patent rejected






   
Microsoft FAT patent rejected
Posted by admin on 30 Sep 2004 - 22:16 2 comments
Previous Post | Tech News | Next Post
 
Microsoft's attempt to create a lucrative future revenue stream from its patent portfolio has tripped at the first hurdle. After an appeal, the US Patent Office has struck down Microsoft's '517 patent (USPTO 5,579, 517) on the FAT file system. Camera makers, amongst many other consumer electronics manufacturers, use the FAT file system on compact flash cards and other removable media.

Microsoft introduced FAT in version 2.0 of MS-DOS in 1982, but was not granted patent '517 until 1996. Last year Redmond used it as the basis of its first ever licensing program, offering manufacturers the right to use the ubiquitous file system in return for a low royalty rate. At the time, Microsoft described this as "liberalization". Industry watchers noted how earlier in the year, Redmond had hired Marshall Phelps, the IBM attorney who in the Eighties, built up Big Blue's IP program from nothing into a multi-billion dollar business.





There are 2 additional comments, Post a comment | View printable post | Open/Close All Comments


#1 Posted by JJCGNQ at 01 Oct 2004 - 15:44 Reply To This Comment  
As if 96% margins on Windoze (sources EU/ Dutch consumer's association were not enough.

Hidden
#2 Posted by JJCGNQ at 01 Oct 2004 - 15:45 Reply To This Comment  
As if 96% margins on Windoze (sources EU/ Dutch consumer's association, when MicroSoft was found guilty of abusing it's near monopoly) were not enough.
Please consider Linux/ Apple's Mac instead.

Hidden
Add A new comment
Name: (Register)
Email: (optional)
Quick HTML: (help)
  Close current tag   Standard Mode
  Close all tags   Enhanced Mode
Comment:


Smilies
(help)
Parse URL's: (will automatically add [url] [/url] round the web addresses in your comment)